UDL Guidelines – Mole Conversion Lesson Checklist | |
Your notes | |
| |
Feature: Videos can be re-sized | |
Barrier: Content in video only. Needs to have captions or speech to text. | |
Barrier: Content in video only. | |
| |
Feature: Vocab terms included in video tutorial | |
Feature: Relating Conversion factors | |
Feature: Include Conversion formulas | |
Barrier: Content in English only | |
Feature: Video Tutorial | |
| |
Feature: Linking to any conversion factor | |
Feature: Provides multiple examples | |
Feature: Provides scaffolding with examples | |
Feature: Gives cue to practice | |
Your notes | |
| |
Barrier: No alternatives for physically responding | |
Barrier: No access to assistive technology | |
| |
Barrier: No alternative media | |
Barrier: No alternative options | |
Feature: Provides scaffolding | |
| |
Feature: Include objectives in tutorial | |
Feature: Include stop and think in tutorial | |
Barrier: No organizational tool options | |
Barrier: No rubric available | |
Your notes | |
| |
Barrier: Only one option for showing understanding | |
Feature: Uses in real world | |
Feature: Safe learning environment. Variation in length of work sessions. | |
| |
Feature: Include with objectives | |
Barrier: No alternatives present | |
Feature: Google Docs discussion | |
Feature: Timely feedback | |
| |
Barrier: Multiple options not provided | |
Feature: Teacher emphasizes learning process | |
Barrier: No option for reflection |
Universal Design for Learning or UDL is a new way to design curriculum to meet the needs of diverse learners. In other words, its a proactive approach to ensuring that all students have equal ability to learn in your classroom. Instead of attempting to fix the student by modifying or retrofitting the curricula, UDL attempts to change the curricula to better fit the students. The goal is shifted from the traditional approach of remembering facts to the UDL approach of creating better learners.
Discussion Questions
1. At the core of UDL is the premise that often the curriculum is disabled (and disabling!). It is not flexible; it often poses barriers, and consequently prevents rather than supports optimal learning experiences. Do you agree or disagree with this view? Why or why not?
- Traditional curriculum is, more often than not, quite disabling for the diverse needs of students. It has been tailored to teach the imaginary majority of students. The reality is that every class has a diversity of learners and they all have different needs to be met in order to learn to their best potential. Many traditional curricula are based on learning from lectures and the text book, with written tests for assessments. This type of curriculum can create barriers in learning for students with visual disabilities, reading disabilities, and even students with attention deficit disorders. It also does not provide the flexibility to allow students that understand the material quickly to move on or learn at a higher level. With all of this in mind, I would say that I agree with that viewpoint. In contrast to traditional curriculum, the UDL approach offers flexibility by providing multiple means of representation, action and expression, and engagement. It meets the basic learning needs of individuals and helps create motivated learners.
2. What are the benefits of analyzing the curriculum for strengths and weaknesses rather than focusing on the student’s strengths and weaknesses? What are the challenges of this approach?
- The curriculum can be changed without lowering expectations. On the other hand, focusing on the student's strengths and weaknesses often results in retrofitted lessons (an afterthought to meet needs of students) and lowered expectations. Curriculum that is designed for strengths and weaknesses can be proactive in meeting the needs of students. This can remove the barriers associated with learning and ensure that all students can meet the high expectations. The major challenge here is that there needs to be a paradigm shift in the way that teachers think about lesson planning and teaching.
Your analysis of your lesson is very thoughtful. If we can let ourselves apply this checklist to just part of our lessons each year, we can't help but improve the way our students learn.
ReplyDelete